Latest Article

Medicare to Keep Paying for Heart Scans

Medicare said Wednesday that it would continue to cover the use of an increasingly popular scanning procedure used to detect heart disease, despite the agency’s earlier misgivings over whether there was sufficient evidence to justify paying for the tests.

Reversing a proposed decision issued last December, Medicare said Wednesday that it would continue to leave payments for the scans — which can cost $600 or more — up to the local insurance carriers that the agency employs to oversee medical claims. Most of the local carriers have been covering the test.

Medicare paid for roughly 70,000 of these heart scans in 2006, according to the agency, at a cost of $40 million to $50 million. For people not yet eligible for Medicare, thousands of other such scans were paid for by commercial insurers or from patients’ own pockets, at prices sometimes close to $1,000. Firm data on the number of non-Medicare patients tested were not immediately available.

Because commercial insurers typically follow Medicare’s lead on what medical procedures they will pay for, Wednesday’s decision seemed likely to allow for continued growth in the number of scans. They are now widely advertised as a noninvasive alternative to tests like angiography — which requires the insertion of a catheter into the blood vessels.

Medicare’s initial proposal, which would have ended payment for the scans unless the patients were enrolled in studies to determine the technology’s effectiveness, had met with fierce resistance from the doctors who perform these scans and the companies that make the equipment. They strongly defended the use of these scans as an important alternative to traditional angiography.

“We found that the evidence is not black and white either way,” said Dr. Barry Straube, the chief medical officer for Medicare. Given the overwhelming criticism of the preliminary decision, the agency decided that it did not have enough reason to override the local carriers’ decision to cover the tests as medically necessary. “Before we make a significant change in policy, we need more evidence,” Dr. Straube said.

Continue reading

Recent articles

Advertising: When a Corporate Donation Raises Protests

WHEN the Columbus Children’s Hospital agreed to name a new lobby after two retail chains to thank their corporate parent for a $5 million donation, everyone was all smiles. The same was true when the Ohio hospital renamed itself Nationwide Children’s Hospital, to acknowledge a $50 million gift from Nationwide insurance, a large local company.

But a coalition of children’s advocates contends that the hospital went too far by agreeing to name a new emergency department and trauma center after another locally based retailer, Abercrombie & Fitch, in exchange for a $10 million donation.

The coalition, which includes the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood, several pediatricians and Parents for Ethical Marketing, is asking the hospital to reconsider the decision made in June 2006 to accept the donation. The plea is being made now because ground is to be broken this year for the building to house the emergency and trauma facilities.

The 15 organizations and 80 individuals that compose the coalition contend that naming the new center after Abercrombie & Fitch — known for provocative advertising and revealing clothing — sends a grievously wrong message.

“It is troubling that a children’s hospital would name its emergency room after a company that routinely relies on highly sexualized marketing to target teens and preteens,” the members of the coalition wrote in a letter that was sent on Tuesday to the hospital’s office in Columbus, Ohio.

“The Abercrombie & Fitch Emergency Department and Trauma Center marries the Abercrombie brand to your reputation,” said the letter, addressed to five senior officers of the hospital. “A company with a long history of undermining children’s well-being is now linked with healing.”

The complaint is an example of negative reaction to the increasingly prevalent practice of naming public facilities after corporate sponsors, donors and supporters.

Opponents who complain about the growing commercialization of the American culture are upset that private companies are able to brand stadiums, parks, schools, school buses and hospitals.

About a dozen hospitals across the country bear corporate or sponsor names, including at least two other children’s hospitals: Mattel Children’s Hospital U.C.L.A. in Los Angeles and Hasbro Children’s Hospital, the pediatric division of Rhode Island Hospital in Providence.

Naming a facility for Abercrombie & Fitch “is more egregious,” said Susan Linn, the director of the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood in Boston, because of the reputation of the retailer as “among the worst corporate predators” for “sexualizing and objectifying children.”

“Selling corporate naming rights is a slippery slope, and this is way down that slope,” said Ms. Linn, who is also the associate director at the media center at Judge Baker Children’s Center, an affiliate of the Harvard Medical School.

The sex-drenched images of toothsome young men and women that Abercrombie & Fitch has used for years to sell its own-brand apparel in ads, posters and catalogs have made the company and its chief executive, Michael S. Jeffries, billions of dollars — and countless enemies.

The opponents of the company’s campaigns, which are typically shot by the fashion photographer Bruce Weber, contend they cross the line by presenting undressed teenagers and 20-somethings in overly sexualized situations. The company describes its ads as playful and celebratory of the free spirit of today’s young Americans.

Last month, the police in Virginia Beach, Va., removed two large posters — part of the chain’s national campaign — from the windows of an Abercrombie store in a mall and charged the manager with an obscenity misdemeanor. One poster showed a woman with a breast mostly exposed and the other displayed three shirtless young men, one of whom was also revealing part of his backside.

The city of Virginia Beach subsequently decided against prosecuting the store manager.

Other times, however, the opponents of the Abercrombie approach have prevailed; in 2003, the company discontinued its popular magazine-style catalog, A.& F. Quarterly, because of mounting complaints from parents about its racy contents.

And a year later, the company, based in New Albany, Ohio, agreed to pay $50 million to settle a suit that accused it of discriminating against minority employees for promotions and cultivating a white-only image.

As for the coalition’s protests against the hospital naming, Tom Lennox, a spokesman at Abercrombie & Fitch, said on Tuesday, “We are proud of our longstanding relationship with the hospital and pleased to help secure its bright future.”

A call from a reporter to Nationwide Children’s Hospital for a response to the letter from the coalition was returned by Jon M. Fitzgerald, the president of the Nationwide Children’s Hospital Foundation.

“I like to focus on the philanthropy of it,” Mr. Fitzgerald said, adding, “I don’t feel comfortable addressing” any of the objections raised in the letter.

“Two years ago, Abercrombie & Fitch made a very significant philanthropic gift,” Mr. Fitzgerald said. “In honor of that gift, we chose to offer recognition of their tremendous support of our organization.”

Mr. Fitzgerald took issue with a contention in the letter that the hospital agreed to “sell naming rights” to Abercrombie & Fitch in exchange for the $10 million.

“We don’t sell naming rights,” Mr. Fitzgerald said. “We as a nonprofit accept gifts to support our mission. We’re looking for philanthropic support.”

The ground-breaking for the building in which the facilities are to be housed will probably take place in late fall, he added, with completion scheduled in 2012. The new lobby, to be named after the Limited Too and Justice retail chains owned by Tween Brands, also will be in the new building.

Abercrombie & Fitch has been a frequent target of criticism from organizations and activists like those that wrote the letter. They also include the National Institute on Media and the Family, Teachers Resisting Unhealthy Children’s Entertainment and Dr. Alvin F. Pouissant, the nationally known professor of psychiatry at the Harvard Medical School.

One school of thought holds that complaints from parents and the establishment only elevate the brand’s appeal with the target audience.

“There’s always a ‘forbidden fruit’ aspect to what adolescents do; that’s probably why they smoke,” said Dr. Victor Strasburger, professor of pediatrics at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine, who also signed the letter. A main goal of the letter is “trying to influence the decision-makers at children’s hospitals to act responsibly,” Dr. Strasburger said. “We’ve reached a point in our society where it seems there’s no such thing as bad publicity,” he added. “We have to pull back from that.”

Abundance is for Everyone

Abundance is for everyone, not just the limited few that life appears to have smiled on. We are surrounded by abundance. Nature is lavish, even wasteful in its abundance. Anyone caring to look will find an abundance of love, joy, money, and health is readily available to everyone willing to accept them. If there is any lack in our lives it's not because there is not enough, but rather, because we are limiting our intake. What we receive in life is controlled by the limits we place on our emotions, behaviors, thoughts and actions. There are many factors involved in why it is so hard for us to open the valve controlling the flow of abundance in our lives. By the time we become aware of the fact that we create our own limits, the beliefs and habits we've developed that produce these limits are so ingrained they are very difficult to change. Society also has its role to play. Since most of the world's governments have become capitalistic societies, it's in their best interest to promote conditions and belief systems that produce large numbers of have-nots. Simple economics tells us that in order for capitalism to thrive, there must be a large supply meeting a large demand and you must have people who are in debt to create a large enough demand to consume that large supply. The simple reality is that the governments of the world make their money from our poor health, debt, and our struggle to "just get by." Their abundance is dependant on our lack. But this does not mean we have to accept these limits. While it's true that most people will never take advantage of it, information about attracting wealth and prosperity is freely available to anyone caring to look. And the law of attraction says that the more you look, the more information you will attract. What fills your life is what you focus on. Learning to create abundance in your life is about much more than simply creating material wealth, it is about enriching your Self as a whole. When you begin to understand the principles and laws that govern Abundance, you begin to understand that you are not constrained by the conditions of the economy or the amount of your present income. Your ability to increase your wealth, live in abundance, and have financial freedom is all based on your understanding of the universal laws that govern the flow of energy controlling your ability to turn potential into reality. Yet there is more to creating abundance than simply placing an order and then sitting back to wait for its delivery. You have to be giving something of value, adding to the flow, in order to make this work. When this is the case people are more than willing to pay for your contribution. Wealth, money, success, love, and health are all forms of energy. Being part of the flow means that you are a participating member. Once you understand how to operate in the flow of that energy, you learn to work with the Source of energy and actively create your reality instead of simply letting random thoughts create a chaotic existence for you. Abundance is about living a healthy, vibrant life with a purpose and experiencing the joy that comes from possessing a strong sense of Self.

I whole-heartedly recommend Carol Look's Attracting Abundance with EFT package to clear all the blocks you have that keep you from attracting whatever you want. Read about it here:
Attracting Abundance

Another great place to learn all you can about using and teaching the Law of Attraction here:
Law of Attraction Training Center

Lilly Waited Too Long to Warn About Schizophrenia Drug, Doctor Testifies

ANCHORAGE — Eli Lilly, the drug maker, could and should have warned physicians as early as 1998 about the link between Zyprexa, its best-selling schizophrenia medicine, and diabetes, an expert witness told jurors Friday in a lawsuit that claims that Zyprexa has caused many mentally ill people to develop diabetes.

Instead, Lilly hid Zyprexa’s risks from doctors to protect the drug’s sales, according to the witness, Dr. John Gueriguian. Lilly waited until 2007 to add strong warnings to Zyprexa’s label to reflect the drug’s tendency to cause severe weight gain and blood sugar changes.

Lilly put “profit over concern of the consumer,” Dr. Gueriguian said Friday near the end of four hours of testimony.

Zyprexa, a drug for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, is by far Lilly’s top-selling product, with worldwide sales of $4.8 billion last year.

The company has said it did nothing wrong and fully disclosed what it knew about Zyprexa to the Food and Drug Administration.

Dr. Gueriguian is testifying on behalf of the State of Alaska, which has sued Lilly to recover its costs for treating Medicaid patients who developed diabetes after taking Zyprexa. The trial is being heard in state court in downtown Anchorage before a jury of seven women and five men.

Dr. Gueriguian is a specialist on diabetes and was a medical reviewer for the Food and Drug Administration for 20 years before retiring in 1998.

At the F.D.A., he recommended against the approval of Rezulin, a diabetes drug that was later withdrawn for causing severe liver damage in patients.

Under examination by Tommy Fibich, a lawyer from Houston who is representing Alaska, Dr. Gueriguian methodically reviewed about a dozen documents in which Lilly scientists and executives discussed the potential links between Zyprexa and diabetes.

Zyprexa was introduced in September 1996 and hailed as a breakthrough medicine for the treatment of schizophrenia.

But doctors quickly began to report to Lilly that patients suffered severe weight gain, high blood sugar and even diabetes after taking the drug.

By the fall of 1998, the combination of adverse-event reports, clinical trial data that showed hyperglycemia and weight gain, and problems in animal studies should have been enough for Lilly to warn doctors about Zyprexa’s links to diabetes, Dr. Gueriguian said. Instead, the company did nothing.

Documents from 1999 and 2000 also showed that Lilly was accumulating evidence of Zyprexa’s risks but not sharing it with doctors, he testified.

And in 2002, only 10 months after Lilly began selling Zyprexa in Japan, medical regulators in that country required Lilly to warn doctors against using Zyprexa in diabetic patients.

But Lilly did not issue a similar advisory to doctors in the United States. Instead, the company advised its sales representatives not to discuss diabetes with doctors unless the doctors brought it up first, according to another document presented at the trial.

“We will NOT proactively address the diabetes concerns,” the document, an internal Lilly memorandum, said.

Court recessed on Friday before lawyers for Lilly could cross-examine Dr. Gueriguian. They will have the opportunity to do so on Monday.

A lawyer for Lilly said after Dr. Gueriguian’s testimony that the company had shared all it knew with the F.D.A. and that the question of the link between Zyprexa and diabetes was still a subject of scientific debate.

Migraine Headache Relief: No Meds Therapy Reports 80% Effectiveness–Often Works in Minutes

San Francisco, CA (PRWEB) -- Stanford Engineer Gary Craig introduces a new approach for migraine headache sufferers. This non-drug treatment is called EFT (Emotional Freedom Techniques) and, through clinical applications, has provided an effectiveness rate of over 80%.

In essence, EFT is an emotional version of acupuncture except needles are not necessary. Instead, gentle fingertip tapping on precise meridian energy points allow the body's subtle energies (or Qi, as it is called in Chinese medicine) to flow unimpeded. This has proven repeatedly to provide relief from a wide variety of pains, including migraine headaches.

An estimated 303 million worldwide experience recurring migraine headaches. At any one time migraines are incapacitating 20 million people, interfering with their productivity and disrupting their personal as well as professional lives. "EFT can nearly eliminate this problem," says Craig. "While qualified physicians should always be consulted, the rapidity and ease with which this process often works is astonishing."

EFT Practitioner Lindsay Kenny reports on one of her early migraine headache cases as follows: "Sherry was out of medication and out of her mind in pain, so she tried lying on the floor and tapping for relief, not knowing whether or not EFT would help. She said that relief came within minutes of tapping and that the migraine was completely gone in less than 10 minutes. She was delighted and astounded. And so was I. That was the first time I knew EFT could work on such serious ailments."

Although EFT is a new process, it has been discovered by innovative members of the medical community. They have found that it effectively addresses the emotional causes to disease and thus provides relief where other methods fail. As Los Angeles Urologist Eric Robins says, "Some day the medical profession will wake up and realize that unresolved emotional issues are the main cause of 85% of all illnesses. When they do, EFT will be one of their primary healing tools .... as it is for me."

Over 225,000 people have downloaded Craig's free training manual and another 5,000 to 10,000 download it each month. Known as The EFT Manual, it has been translated by volunteer practitioners into nine languages. The EFT website is the sixth most actively visited natural health site in the world.

The EFT Manual gives anyone all the basics so they can apply it right away. It can be freely downloaded at...

Download the Free EFT Manual

When Anxiety Is at the Table

FOR some of us the trouble starts before we even step into a restaurant.

If Carole Johnson, a retired school administrator who lives near Sacramento, Calif., happens to have a distressing thought while passing through a doorway, she needs to “clear” the thought by passing through the door twice more, doing it precisely three times.

My own challenge is fighting the urge to return to my parked car and check yet again that the parking brake is secure. If I don’t, how can I be sure my car won’t roll into something — or worse, someone?

Ms. Johnson and I are but two of the estimated five to seven million Americans battling obsessive-compulsive disorder, an anxiety disorder characterized by intrusive distressing thoughts and repetitive rituals aimed at dislodging those thoughts. We are an eclectic bunch spanning every imaginable cross-section of society, and we battle an equally eclectic mix of obsessions and compulsions. Some of us obsess about contamination, others about hurting people, and still others about symmetry. Almost all of us can find something to obsess about at a restaurant.

Sometimes the trouble is the element of public theater in the dining room, meaning we have to indulge in our often-embarrassing rituals under the eyes of so many strangers while trying not to get caught. Or it might be worrying about the safety of the food and the people who serve it.

Many of the situations that unsettle people with obsessive-compulsive disorder — driving, for instance — provoke at least some level of anxiety in just about everyone. But restaurants are designed to be calming and relaxing. That is one of the main reasons people like to eat out.

To many of us with obsessive-compulsive disorder, those pleasures are invisible. We walk into a calm and civilized dining room and see things we won’t be able to control. This feeds directly into one of the unifying themes of the disorder: an often crushing inability to handle the unknown.

“The common thread, I think, has something to do with certainty,” said Dr. Michael Jenike, medical director of the Obsessive Compulsive Disorders Institute at McLean Hospital in Belmont, Mass., which is affiliated with Harvard Medical School. “If you have O.C.D., whatever form, there seems to be some problem with being certain about things — whether they’re safe or whether they’ve been done right.”

If lack of certainty is our common challenge, than warding off uncertainty is our common quest. For some of us battling obsessive-compulsive disorder, that means scrubbing our hands to make sure they’re clean, or checking and re-checking everything around us in the name of safety. For others, the need is to arrange various items in order, or repeat actions in ritualized sequences in vain attempts at removing doubt.

These quirks lead to some serious complications in our lives, especially when we find ourselves in a place that triggers obsessive-compulsive behavior, like a restaurant. Once Ms. Johnson gets past the door, she often needs to try out a few tables, looking for one that feels right, as a frustrated maître d’hôtel looks on.

Personally, I am fine with just about any table, although the wobbly ones can spell big trouble. I have harm obsessions, which means I am plagued by the fear that other people will be hurt by something I do, or don’t do. Seated at a less-than-sturdy table, I conjure images of fellow diners being crushed or otherwise injured should I fail to notify the restaurant’s management. This is called a reporting compulsion in the vernacular of the disorder, and before I learned to fight these urges, many a manager heard from me.

One of them was the woman running a coffee house I frequent. One day while sipping my latte at a fake-marble table I leaned forward, and the far end of the tabletop lifted. This barely moved my coffee cup, but it sent my nerves right through the roof. Before I realized it I was crouched over, my head upside down beneath the table. The only responsible thing to do, I decided, was to ask the woman behind the counter to come over for a look. Her lack of concern only exacerbated my problems.

Forget the tabletop, my friend Matt Solomon tells me; it’s what’s on top of the table, and precisely where, that really matters. Mr. Solomon is a 39-year-old lawyer in Fort Worth with order compulsions. To enjoy a meal he needs to separate the salt and pepper shakers, and, ideally, place a napkin holder or other divider midway between them.

Why? He can no more answer that than Ms. Johnson can tell you why she needs to chew her food in sets of three bites or drink her beverages three sips at a time. Three is her magic number. That is about as refined an explanation as any of us can give for our compulsions, rituals that we understand are entirely illogical.

Some of our other concerns may seem familiar. I imagine most diners, for example, have noticed and perhaps even struggled to remove white detergent spots that can sometimes be seen on silverware. But few, I suspect, have gone to the lengths Jared Kant has to get rid of them. Mr. Kant is a 24-year-old research assistant living outside of Boston who has obsessive fears of contamination. (He first came to my attention when I read a memoir he wrote about living with obsessive-compulsive disorder.) Last year he visited a Chinese restaurant with several friends, one of whom pointed out that their silverware was spotted and seemed dirty. Mr. Kant collected all the utensils at the table and attempted to sterilize them by holding them above a small flame at the center of a pu-pu platter, quickly attracting the attention of their waiter.

Ah, waiters, and waitresses. And bartenders. For some with obsessive-compulsive disorder, the success or failure of a dining experience can hinge on the appearance of a restaurant’s staff.

Mr. Solomon, for example, feels compelled to inspect the hands of anyone serving him. Cuts and scrapes are objectionable because in his mind, they can lead to his contracting a disease that could kill him.

This past Halloween, Mr. Solomon ate at the bar of a steakhouse, where he was served by a bartender dressed in a devil costume. He noticed a small red stain on the man’s right knuckle, and couldn’t rule out the possibility that the stain was blood. Trying to avoid things the bartender had touched, Mr. Solomon used a straw to drink from his water glass and swapped the silverware the bartender had placed in front of him for another set from farther down the bar.

Coincidentally, Mr. Solomon and Mr. Kant have each battled contamination issues on both sides of the counter. Mr. Solomon spent years working as a bartender, often consumed by thoughts of becoming deathly ill. He was convinced that one of his regular customers was carrying a fatal virus, and came up with strategies to minimize contact. “I would always quickly put his change down before he could try to take it from my hand,” he said.

The challenge for Mr. Kant was serving lattes. In his late teens, while training to be a barista, he learned of the potential dangers from improperly handled milk. He became obsessed with the possibility of harming customers through inadvertent negligence. Even worse was the prospect that he might never know. “My biggest fear was that one day I would find out that a customer had come down sick, brutally sick with something, and the only thing they knew was that they’d had a latte,” Mr. Kant said.

I can’t imagine handling even the most basic server duties, like adding up the items on a customer’s bill. I struggle enough with checking and rechecking my tip calculations. And that’s just one of my challenges at the end of a meal.

As part of my harm obsession, one of my concerns is that germs from my mouth will hurt others. Although I try to keep my fingers away from my lips and their germs while I’m eating, I’m rarely successful (it’s not as easy as it sounds). By the end of the meal I believe that my hands are contaminated. The problem is that I need them to scribble my signature on the check. If I’m lucky, I will have remembered to bring my own pen; if not, I may feel compelled to “table-wash” my hands, a little trick I developed over the years: I use the condensation on the outside of a cold water glass to rinse off the germs. (Forget drying my hands, by the way; my napkin would only re-contaminate them.)

Once the check is signed, I must be sure that it is really signed. At my worst, I have opened and closed the vinyl check holder again and again, seeing my signature each time, yet unable to feel certain. I’ve left the table, only to return to check again. And again.

Help is available, in the form of a therapy called exposure response prevention. As the name suggests, the technique calls for exposing people with obsessive-compulsive disorder to situations that trigger obsessions, then preventing them from acting on them. The therapy addresses low-level anxieties, and works up from there.

With restaurant cleanliness, for example, a therapist might have an client rate his anxiety about challenges ranging from simply touching spotted silverware to eating from a spotted plate. Then the therapist would ask him to face those situations while fighting the compulsion to clean or replace spotted items.

The therapy attempts to alter behavior, but it appears to alter much more than that. Dr. Sanjaya Saxena, the director of a program for obsessive-compulsive disorders at the University of California at San Diego, said that exposure response prevention therapy “certainly is changing the brain at the molecular level — that is, at the level of particular proteins that are expressed and created and on the level of neurotransmitter function.” In that sense, he said, “behavioral therapy is biological therapy.”

I am no brain scientist. I understand almost nothing about proteins and neurotransmitters. But my own extensive work with this particular form of torture (that is, directed treatment), with medication, has progressively allowed me to take back much of the life my disorder stole from me.

Today I travel extensively, sharing my recovery story and working with groups like the Obsessive Compulsive Foundation to raise awareness. In my job as a radio news anchor, I don’t have to eat out much, but when I’m on the road for work related to the disorder, I wind up eating in a lot of restaurants. I can honestly say I’m starting to enjoy it. In fact, while I still like ice water with my meal, I often find myself drinking from the glass, not washing with it.

Now when I say check, please, I’m simply asking for my bill.

« Previous Entries |